Living in the shadows…

July 17th, 2008

I did something deliciously subversive on last.fm (the online music radio station) yesterday. I wrote a short piece on Christopher Gordon’s biog page about the fact that there are two composers by that name.

If you don’t know who the other Christopher Gordon is - he is best known for film scores such as ‘On The Beach’, ‘Moby Dick’ and ‘Master and Commander’. I have never met him but it is spooky (to say the least) that he was born in London where I have lived for the last, well, quite a few years and we don’t look that dissimilar -judging by the thumbnail of him on his biog page.

He has lived in Australia for what I suppose is most of his professional life and, other than the facts given above, that is all I know about him. However, I’m getting a little suspicious that the rights society I joined last year, GEMA, are mixing him up with me and he is enjoying royalties which I have earned. I know it sounds paranoid and I know they have ‘checks and balances’ but it is a real fear nonetheless.

Recently I sent GEMA over a dozen broadcast and live performance notification forms after I naively imagined that they, being a 21st century royalty collection agency, would have all the up-to-date technical software and hardware to ’sniff out’ performances without my help. No such luck! They didn’t have a clue and we’re not talking a couple of gigs in a pub in Romford (oh, you remember that brawl afterwards, too!). Au contraire, my furry little friends, we are talking big time here. A BBC Prom (youtube.com) which was televised, shown live with simultaneous radio broadcast on BBC Radio 3 plus about 8 or 9 non-UK radio staions relaying the concert either on the night or afterwards. And those are only the ones I found by googling the concert.

None of this was found by GEMA. All they said was: ‘We will contact PRS (the UK collection society) to ask them.’ Well, I won’t be holding my breath since there are stories I could tell you about that organisation which you would not believe.

There is the one about the aging rock star who they ‘recruited’ as a ‘consultant’ back in the days when sinecures were graced with silly names such as that. He waltzed around the offices and corridors clutching a wooden briefcase - I kid you not - a wooden briefcase and was always flying off to New York first class for a meeting with Sir Paul or Madonna or God knows who! (Actually, it was in the days of Concorde which he took a very great penchant to!). And believe me, this was one of the minor ‘peccadillos’ of the regime (one might say, the ‘ancien régime’) which governed PRS at that time.

I hope, for all our sakes, that such nonsenses have long been assigned to PRS’s big dustbin of ‘policies which have utterly failed their membership’. Sincerely, I hope that is the case. As I say, I am with GEMA now. I was with the Woolwich but that is another story.

I will keep up the pressure on GEMA to deliver up the goods but I really think it’s time that these scoieties and agencies around the world began to feel a sense of personal and social responsibility towrds those who, literally, pay their salaries - the composers and lyric-writers of the world. I would include publishers here and there are very many decent outfits who are willing to share the wealth they create jointly with their artist clients but I’ve known a lot of dogdy, even criminally dodgy, examples of publishers to be able to wholeheartedly include them as ‘victims’ of the collection societies/agencies.

This little piece has strayed somewhat from its original subject-matter. Nevertheless, I hope you enjoyed reading it. Come back soon for another thrilling instalment with, perhaps, another lurid tale from the murky annals of PRS of Berners Street, London Town!

By the way - you can listen to selected music by Chris Gordon on last.fm at: coolwindchris

About Poor Max!

June 24th, 2008

If you have read my journal entry about Gathering Starflowers, you may have put 2 and 2 together and realised that Poor Max! is connected somehow to Gathering Starflowers.

Well, you would be right. The connection is simple. Poor Max! is my own agitprop song which I imagined Flip and Vero writing and performing outside Kempinski’s on the Ku’damm in Berlin instead of setting fire to Max the dachshund. However, though I do say it myself as shouldn’t, my song is a bit more sophisticated than anything they could have composed.

Whatever the truth may be, it serves its purpose as a condemnation of war and violence in all its forms. War and violence are not clever, they are not romantic and not to be admired. Those that ‘glorify’ war are not to be admired, nor should they be honoured.I believe building bridges achieves far more than can ever be achieved by destroying them.

What do you think?

Die Sorglichen continued…

June 20th, 2008

As far as we know, they were never performed - anywhere. Except, perhaps, for one song - Der Nachtwandler (The Night Wanderer) - a setting of a poem by Gustav Falke (remember that name!). This was probably rehearsed at the theatre with Schönberg conducting but it was never heard by the public. It has the odd accompaniment of piccolo, trumpet, side-drum and piano and at that first rehearsal it appears that the trumpet player took exception to his part, claiming it was too hard. (How many times has a composer heard that!) So into a drawer it went, along with the other six songs which are more conventionally scored for soprano voice and piano!

He struggled on at the Überbrettl but things were quickly unravelling, not least because von Wolzogen’s whole Buntes Theater was experiencing a ‘liquidity crisis’ - it was fast running out of money and the theatre closed its doors in 1902. Schönberg’s contract with the Buntes Theater was terminated in July 1902. He turned in desperation to Richard Strauss for assistance. Strauss, at that time, thought very highly of Schönberg both as a composer and a teacher, however amazing this may seem. Strauss, by coincidence, was based in Berlin and had enormous influence locally. He secured a teaching post for him at the Stern Conservatoire, one of Berlin’s leading music schools, and Schönberg supplemented his teaching income with jobs from music publishers, orchestrating dozens of forgotten operettas and Singspiele (musical plays). However, things continued to prove very difficult for the Schönbergs now there were three mouths to feed. So, by July 1903, they were back home in Vienna.

Now let’s ‘fast-forward’ 6 years or so. Schönberg is now back in Vienna, his little ‘adventure’ in Berlin a fairly dim memory. He had set up his own private teaching practice in 1904, advertising for students in Viennese newspapers and they were coming to him in quite large numbers. One of the first to ’sign up’ was a young composer and musicologist called Anton von Webern. He later dropped the aristocratic ‘von’ from his name. He was joined later that first year (1904) by Alban Berg, a shy and diffident young man who had come to the attention of Schönberg when Berg’s sister, Smaragda, had visited him with an armful of songs her brother had written from 1900 onwards. These songs impressed Schönberg enough to accept Berg as his student - in fact, because of the precarious state of the Bergs’ finances, Schönberg waived his fee until it could be paid without financial embarrassment to the family, such was his faith in his new student. So, with Berg happily ensconced as a student of Schönberg, who musically ‘took Berg apart and put him back together’, we can now start to talk about this funny little song which Berg composed sometime in 1907.

Let’s start with the text. Remember the name Gustav Falke I asked you to ‘file away’ for a minute? Well, the poem Berg has chosen as the basis for his song, Die Sorglichen, is by Falke. It seems to me that this is no coincidence. Berg has chosen a poem of Falke’s to honour his teacher and to show, in his honest and naïve way, his unbounded admiration. How would this little song show all that? Let me explain.

I think it is highly likely that Schönberg told at least some of his students of his sojourn in Berlin in 1901-2. He was a great raconteur and I’m sure the young impressionable young men who surrounded him would have been hugely entertained by these stories. Remember that this is a time before television and even radio. Social story-telling was an art cultivated by many, and not just the educated and articulated. So a ‘good yarn’ was appreciated as part of any social activity. Berg, however, was more impressionable and imaginative even than his peers in the ‘Schönberg circle’ and it is not beyond the bounds of possibilities that his imagination ran away with him.

It must have been immensely exciting to hear Schönberg’s stories about Berlin and the Überbrettl and to imagine his teacher as the musical director of a ‘music-hall’ orchestra - rubbing shoulders with flamboyant actors and coquettish actresses, with singers, dancers, comedians and acrobats, too. A ‘colourful’, daring and glamourous world. If Berg had learnt about the ‘Überbrettl Adventure’, it is a given that he would have drunk in every word of Schönberg’s and further, he would have used them as the jumping-off place for fantasies of his own - the way children used to dream of running away to join a circus. This remains speculation, of course, since we have no written evidence that any of this is true.

However, we do have the ‘evidence’ of Die Sorglichen in the sense that it exists. There is no doubt that Berg wrote this song and to this we can add the clue that there are no other songs by Berg which are like it. It is definitely a ‘one-off’. Unique. Like all of his other early songs, with the exception of the famous ‘Seven Early Songs’ which he reprieved, Die Sorglichen was suppressed by Berg - publication was forever forbidden - and it only appeared in print in 1985, in a collection of Berg’s early song by his publishers, Universal Edition, edited by Christopher Hailey. So, Die Sorglichen, on the surface, looks like an experiment that he later disowned as a ’sin of his youth’ although I don’t think there is anything about it which should have caused him to feel ashamed.

Before I talk about the music, I would like to go back to the text. Falke’s poem isn’t, if I am honest, a true cabaret lyric. It concerns a group of pessimistic country folk who, when it is spring, long for summer’s warmth. When summer comes, though, it’s too hot for them, so they long for autumn. Autumn comes but it’s too windy, so they hanker after winter but, you’ve guessed it, winter’s too cold so they long for spring… you get the picture. The country ‘Goldilocks’ are never happy with the weather, whatever the time of year! It’s full of old German sardonic humour and a German or Austrian audience (a cabaret audience, perhaps?) would have laughed uproariously at the ‘country bumpkins’. So what does Berg do with this poem?

Berg’s music employs a strophic, ‘mock folksong’ style, neatly counterpointing the satire of the poem, complete with a dour section which grinds along at half-speed when the poor ‘worriers’ are really in their cups, as they huddle round their rustic stove and dream of the coming thaw. Berg had a highly developed - one could say, highly-tuned - sense of humour. He was a great mimic and would poke fun at people who he considered pompous or irritating with devastating effect. His wife, Helene, shared this ‘gift’ and their targets were often those in position of authority or members of the musical ‘establishment’ who either did not share the views of the ‘Schönberg circle’ or who actively opposed them. The majority of critics writing for Viennese newspapers would often come under attack from Berg!

Having said this, Berg also had a highly developed moral sense which, I would say, kept him on an ethical as well as an artistic and spiritual ’straight and narrow’ path. Here is one of my favourite stories about Berg. It may strike readers as rather ‘politically incorrect’ now since it involves that diabolical weed, tobacco. In 1928, when his first opera, Wozzeck, was meeting with international acclaim, the Austrian National Tobacco company, Austria Tabak, announced a new cigarette, aimed at the middle class smoker. It was named Jonny, after the eponymous hero of Ernst Krenek internationally successful musical: ‘Jonny Spielt Auf’ usually translated as ‘Jonny Strikes Up’ since he is a violinist - although that in itself is a pun on smoking parlance in English and the transliteration is just as ironically cruel: ‘Jonny Plays Up’. Those two meanings are lost in German but a bit a fun, nevertheless, at Krenek’s expense.

When he heard about the ‘Jonny’ cigarette, Berg wrote to the directors of Austria Tabak with the suggestion that they call their cheapest, coarsest cigarette ‘Wozzeck’ after the similarly eponymous hero (or rather anti-hero) of his own successful opera. The suggestion was politely but firmly declined and that rankled with Berg until the end of his life. I think this shows a sardonic sense of humour at work. I’ve no doubt that Berg was completely genuine in his motives in offering Wozzeck as a name for a cheap cigarette - one that could be afforded by all. He was a heavy smoker himself. At the same time, a heavy sense of ironic satisfaction would have accompanied the acceptance of his suggestion for the very reason that Wozzeck is the most abused, most ‘put upon’ character Berg ever brought to the stage: or at least that Georg Büchner, on whose play, Woyzeck, Berg’s based his opera, brought to the stage. In turn, Büchner’s Woyzeck is based on real people and events. In relating all of this, I am suggesting that Die Sorglichen is ‘all-in-all’ with Berg’s sense of humour and enjoyment of lampooning people whose sense of pompous indignation is taken to the point of absurdity.

Allow me, though, one more journey back to Schönberg’s time at the Buntes Theater and the Überbrettl. One of the 7 songs which Schönberg wrote for von Wolzogen (who, by the way, wrote the libretto for Richard Strauss’ opera, Feuersnot) was ‘Galathea’, with text by Frank Wedekind. Note too, the latter’s connection with Berg: Wedekind was the author of the 2 plays on which Berg’s second (and last) opera, Lulu, is based. These do not concern us here but it is certainly interesting that Wedekind was closely associated with von Wolzogen’s ‘cabaret movement’ and, together with a fellow German poet, Otto Julius Bierbaum, published the above-mentioned ‘Deutsche Chansons’ which were intended to provide composers all over the German-speaking world with lyrics the new movement for ‘artistic taste’ in popular entertainment hoped would both ‘elevate’ performances and enlighten audiences. You will probably not be surprised to hear that the movement was short-lived! Schönberg did embrace the ‘ideology’ for this brief span while he lived and worked in Berlin.

And this Wedekind song - Galathea - a saucy little number, indeed, was the first to be written. Galathea is about a middle-aged gentleman who throughout the song, is kissing various parts of young Galathea’s body. It is only at the end of the song that we are told that he is fantasising about kissing her. In the vernacular: ‘In your dreams, mate!’ The interesting fact is: there are musical ‘correspondences’ between Galathea and Die Sorglichen. Remember again, Falke was one of the poets contributing to this populist oeuvre. So, too, did Wedekind, whose plays fascinated Berg. Musically, too, the songs seem to have an affinity. Both are in two-four, although in different keys - Galathea in G major; Die Sorglichen in A major. Both are strophic as, indeed, are the other Brettl-Lieder in keeping with popular song practice. Berg never again resorted to such an ‘old-fashioned’ form, redolent as it is of folksong which to Schönberg’s followers was taboo. The shape of the melodies are also, if not exactly the same, are at least similar as are the accompaniments. Schönberg using an almost continuous running semiquaver plus semiquaver triplets rhythm throughout each stanza. This is only broken once when the protagonist starts to feel reality creeping into his fantasy!

Berg utilises a similar scheme. Each strophe has the same rhythmic and melodic patterns to accompany it and a semiquaver ‘motor rhythm’ present almost throughout. The only exception is the dour half-speed section I have mentioned mirroring the place in Galathea where the fantasy breaks down. To this I would add that, although, Schönberg was after a banal, ‘belly laugh’, effect with these songs (and with Galathea, in particular) they are camouflaged with a sophistication which far outweighs the sentiments expressed in the subject matter. Schönberg knew precisely what he was doing. He refused to compromise his talent or his musical judgement. They were always paramount. It must have been galling to him, then, that these songs failed to get a public performance in Berlin.

The fact that Berg’s attempt at a lighter style works is as much a tribute to Schönberg as it is to Berg. I wonder whether Alban was ever shown these songs by his teacher. Perhaps Schönberg, after one of his Berlin ‘anecdotes’ went to fetch the songs for his students - perhaps Berg alone - to see. Maybe they would have served as a warning - stay away from music theatre and cabaret impresarios! - who knows? All I can suggest is that Berg did see Galathea, if not the other Brettl-Lieder. I think that much is provable, even without documentary or contemporary oral evidence. Certainly, Schönberg never mentioned them in his writings and the majority of his biographers have given them ’short shrift’.

We shouldn’t be surprised at this, if we bear in mind their provenance. Berg would have seen them in a much more romantic light than Schönberg’s biographers and I think Die Sorglichen shows his admiration for his teacher’s eclectic taste and sense of adventure - for in this little song he pays homage to these two qualities and he pays homage, also, to many of the qualities (for instance, his teacher’s ever-present steely determination to succeed) that Berg saw in his teacher and which he considered he lacked.

© Chris Gordon

September 2007

 

Music Tracks at Last.fm

June 20th, 2008

New Songs for Old - Poor Max!

February 12th, 2008

I think it is time as many composers, singers and instrumentalists as possible joined hands and used their considerable collective talents to counteract the torrent of bellicose rhetoric and propaganda being hurled at us on a daily basis. We have the means to redress the balance a little. That means is the ‘protest’ song or ‘anti-war’ song. They both have a long and noble history from the Marseilles to Blowin’ in the Wind and I would like to be part of a revival of the genre. In these songs, we can create music and lyrics which touch people emotionally and also make them think about what is actually happening around the world.

I hope we can shake off our complacency and stop thinking that there is nothing we can do. Nothing could be further from the truth! We have been ‘brain-washed’ into believing that we are powerless, impotent. We are not! We can marshal and mobilise our musical and poetic talents to soothe, excite, stimulate and above all, persuade many, many decent and moral human beings that all is not right with the world. At the very least, we need to tell the world that, as musicians, we do care about serious, unforgivable criminal injustices which are being acted out on the face of this beautiful planet every day, every hour, every minute.

Below is an MP3 of the Finale file. Although a bit ‘rough and ready’ and without words, it gives you an idea of what the song is about. Please listen to it. All you have to do then is email me (lm.coolwindmusic@gmail.com) with your plans to perform or record Poor Max! and I will email you a PDF of the score. After 30 June 2008, please use the PayPal button which will be provided to buy your print copy for $5.95. The money will contribute towards the running costs of New Songs For Old which I hope will attract composers and performers (singers and instrumentalists) to add their contributions to this important task. It is such a small price to pay for something so important and I know you won’t be disappointed.

Poor Max! MP3

Alban Berg (1885-1935) Die Sorglichen

January 25th, 2008

 

 

 

I would like to begin this little essay about Berg’s song ‘Die Sorglichen’ with a diversion - the importance of which will quickly become clear.

 

In the summer of 1901, Ernst von Wolzogen visited Vienna with a troupe of cabaret artistes who performed at von Wolzogen’s Berlin cabaret (variety theatre would probably be a more accurate description) called the ‘Überbrettl’ which was literally ‘above the boards’ (i.e. in an upstairs room) of the Buntes Theater (Coloured Theatre) in Berlin.

 

One of von Wolzogen’s objectives in visiting Vienna was to seek out new talent for his ‘cabaret’ venture and the name of an up-and-coming composer and conductor was suggested by Oscar Straus, the erstwhile music director of the Überbrettl. Oscar was a native of Vienna and he knew many of the professional musicians working in the city at that time. The name that was put to von Wolzogen was that of one Arnold Schönberg. A meeting between the three was arranged and Schönberg was offered a contract to work at the Buntes Theater as ‘musical director’ (his specific duties were kept rather vague). The contract stipulated that he would take up his duties in December 1901.

 

It is not surprising that Schönberg jumped at this chance of regular paid employment, albeit in Berlin, 800 miles from Vienna. In October 1901, he had married Mathilde, the sister of his close friend and teacher, Alexander von Zemlinsky, so he was bound by a duty of care to provide for her. Also, Mathilde was pregnant. In fact, she was so late on in her pregnancy that their first child, Gertrude, was born in Berlin in January 1902.

 

Schönberg and Mathilde, then, arrived in Berlin, capital of Prussia and hub of the nascent German Empire, in early December 1901. Arnold settled into his new job but things did not go according to plan. He was hardly ever asked to conduct at the theatre, let alone compose anything. The only music he had completed for performance specifically at the Überbrettl were 7 ‘cabaret’ songs to texts he had found in Frank Wedekind and Otto Julius Bierbaum’s collection of popular lyrics - Deutsche Chansons. These he had written in Vienna between April and September 1901 and Schönberg had shown them to von Wolzogen who, impressed by what he saw, duly ’signed Schönberg up’.

More… 

 

6 Little Piano Pieces - Chris Gordon

January 6th, 2008

I have put these little piano pieces of mine on the LM website as an example of what you can achieve in just a few pages of music. Pieces 1 - 4 are one page each. Pieces 5 and 6 are 3 pages!

They are available at FreeHandMusic:
6 Little Piano Pieces

Hopefully, it will ’spark’ imagination and provide a ‘model’ to show that conciseness is a very admirable quality for a composer to have! Anyone can write at length. Saying what you want to say in a few ‘words’ is much harder!

The first MP3 is of the first five pieces and the second MP3 is of Piece 6.

Little Piano Piece 1-5

Little Piano Piece 6

Living Music Project - Entry Rules

December 4th, 2007

1. Composers may submit as many works as they wish. There is also no time limit for submissions. The LM/CWM Call For Works is a ‘rolling programme’ to achieve a fundamental repertoire of new works for the customers of Free Hand Music (FHM) and their associate online music-sellers to download and enjoy.

2. All submissions to be made an Adobe Acrobat PDFs produced from a music-setting program (Finale, Sibelius, Score are preferred). This means paper print or manuscript (original or photocopied) submissions will not be accepted.

3. All submissions will be made by email to lm.coolwindmusic@gmail.com - in keeping with the spirit of digital music distribution.

4. Scores will be A4 portrait format (no landscape format) and no more than 24 pages. Individual parts must be provided for all scores which require them. These can be included with the PDF of the score (i.e. added after the last page of the score) or sent as a separate PDF. As a ‘rule of thumb’, all scores for more than 3 instruments should have a separate parts PDF.

Playing scores (i.e. scores for 2 woodwind/brass or stringed instruments) can be submitted without individual parts, pending a Call for Works for such scores.

5. All submissions must be accompanied by a LM/CWM fully completed application form. The composer must also pay the non-refundable administration fee (currently £5.00 (GBP) per score submitted) via the Cool Wind Music PayPal account.

6. All composers whose works are chosen for inclusion in the Living Music repertoire of Cool Wind Music will be notified by email. Upon notification, composers will be sent (by post) a non-exclusive agreement entitling Cool Wind Music to upload the work to Free Hand Music and sell the work on the Free Hand Music website (freehandmusic.com) and those of their associate music resellers. This agreement has to be signed and returned before works can be uploaded to the FHM website. The chosen work(s) will then be available world-wide to FHM and associated music resellers’ online customers.

7. Composers whose work(s) are selected must have a current (active) PayPal account in order to receive royalty payments. Details (co-ordinates) of a composer’s PayPal account must be submitted to LM/CoolWindMusic when returning the signed agreement.

8. Composers whose work(s) are available at FHM and associate online sites will receive royalties for all copies sold in accordance with FHM royalty distribution practice, schedules and tariffs. Royalties will be payable to Cool Wind Music as publisher and will be distributed by Living Music/Cool Wind Music via PayPal within 30 days of receipt, subject to the correct funds having been received from Free Hand Music.

9. All queries will be dealt with sympathetically and as much assistance provided as time and other commitments allow but in the case of disputes, the judgement of the committee of LM/CWM, taken together with the advice of officers of FHM, where necessary, will be final.

The Living Music Project

December 4th, 2007

(in association with Cool Wind Music and Free Hand Music)

A commercial break for composers who want to write for a world-wide music market.

Living Music invites composers to write for a ‘digital’ music-buying public. Submit your music to Living Music and, if chosen, it will be published to be available digitally at Freehand Music - the biggest online sheet music store in the world.

A number of Call for Works are planned and scores in the following categories will be considered. These are shown in the order in which they will be announced starting with piano music in February 2008.

• Piano solo

• Solo woodwind (flute, oboe, clarinet, bassoon) or saxophone and piano

• String ensemble (1st violin, 2nd violin, viola, ‘cello, double bass)

• Saxophone quartet (soprano, alto, tenor and baritone saxophones)

Living Music is looking for composers who can show they have the ability and imagination to write attractive and interesting music for non-professional or occasional musicians without selling themselves or their customers short.

The traditional ‘career path’ for composers is to aim to be noticed by professional ensembles with the object of having their music performed ‘on the professional stage’. Living Music hopes to connect composers with another ‘audience’ - the musicians who buy sheet music to play either at home or in their neighbourhood. The musician who plays for pleasure, for the sheer love of music - the amateur!

Living Music intends to develop a repertoire with music that builds trust between players and composers which will entice players to return to time and time again. The discipline of having to write music ‘to order’, albeit by a very simple constraint of writing for a specific group of instruments and with a maximum length, is of immense value to composers, however gifted - especially for those at the start of their professional careers.

Living Music will offer a limited contract to composers whose works are chosen to be sold online at Free Hand Music (www.freehandmusic.com). FHM is the largest online music reseller and accounts to Cool Wind Music for all copies sold less their costs. This means LM/CWM will pass on all sales royalties payable to composers less a small administration fee (10% of royalties paid). The only requirements are the composer’s agreement to a limited contract covering FHM sales only and a current PayPal account into which royalties can be paid.

Living Music also plans to promote suitable works to selected performance groups (ensembles) and solo performers in order to secure performances which will help to bring Living Music composers to the notice of a wider concert-going audience.

Please note: a £5.00 (GBP) administration fee for each work submitted will be charged - payable to Cool Wind Music’s PayPal account. This will cover initial set-up costs and on-going publicity and promotion.

Pay for your submission(s) here. This PayPal button accepts multiple submission fees. Upon receipt of your payment, we will email full details and an application form.

Please email Living Music (lm.coolwindmusic@gmail.com) if you have any queries.

Apply here!